6. The errors connected with substitution of the analysis of risks by the analysis of those commercial motives who speaks about them

It is possible to argue as follows: if human investigates risks free of charge he is unemployed and marginal nut, but if he wishes to receive for it money, he parasitizes on public fears, and if it is his direct official duties, to trust him is impossible because he is the agent of the state and washes brains of the population. From here it is visible, that the direct communication between money and the analysis of risks is not present, though in some cases it is possible. The explanation through simplification is called «reductionism» and allows to explain everything.