6. The errors connected with substitution of the analysis of risks
by the analysis of those commercial motives who speaks about them
It is possible to argue as follows: if human
investigates risks free of charge he is unemployed and marginal nut, but if he
wishes to receive for it money, he parasitizes on public fears, and if it is
his direct official duties, to trust him is impossible because he is the agent
of the state and washes brains of the population. From here it is visible, that
the direct communication between money and the analysis of risks is not
present, though in some cases it is possible. The explanation through
simplification is called ÇreductionismÈ and allows to explain everything.